<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/53294">
<title>DACSEIS Research Paper Series</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10900/53294</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47296"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47281"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47246"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47236"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T20:51:23Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47296">
<title>The Impact of multiple imputation for DACSEIS</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47296</link>
<description>The Impact of multiple imputation for DACSEIS
Rässler, Susanne
This paper is designed to provide an extensive introduction to the
principles of multiple imputation and to give some general
recommendations of using multiple imputation techniques in the
DACSEIS universes. The definition of an ignorable missingness
mechanism is explained, and the concept of the observed-data
likelihood is discussed. To introduce the multiple imputation
principle a short introduction of Bayesian statistics is provided.
A small simulation study is performed comparing different
approaches to illuminate the advantages and disadvantages of
different imputation techniques. Finally, an overview about
recently available multiple imputation software is given and
violations of the assumptions made are addressed.
</description>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47281">
<title>On the simulation of complex universes in the case of applying the german microcensus</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47281</link>
<description>On the simulation of complex universes in the case of applying the german microcensus
Münnich, Ralf; Schürle, Josef
The aim of the DACSEIS project is to deliver recommendations on the
use of variance estimators under complex survey designs in the
presence of non-response. Since mathematical comparisons on the
efficiency of variance estimation methods in this field are generally
unavailable or lead to irrelevant results, adequate simulation
studies have to be carried out that are based on realistic data sets.
To be able to carry out a simulation study in the frame of complex designs
one has to draw samples from a universe respecting for the true sampling
design. However, in many cases, no data or only outdated data are
available for the universe which leads to the need of adequately generating
a micro data set from the sample.

Within this paper, a procedure of generating the universe for the
German microcensus, which is a 1 sample of the population living in Germany,
will be presented. The procedure allows for an adequate consideration of
the individual information on a limited data set and can therefore be
used as a basis for the simulations on variance estimation methods
on the German microcensus data.
</description>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47246">
<title>A comparison of the five Labour Force Surveys of the DACSEIS project from a sampling theory point of view</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47246</link>
<description>A comparison of the five Labour Force Surveys of the DACSEIS project from a sampling theory point of view
Quatember, Andreas
Labour market data are important for the assessment of the working of the national social and economic policies and as an indicator for social trouble spots. The European Union therefore pays very much attention in the harmonisation of the national Labour Force Surveys to be able to have comparable data of high quality.

In this paper these surveys, that are included in the DACSEIS project (IST-2000-26057) are compared from a sampling theory point of view to show the similiarities as well as the differences of these surveys from this aspect.
</description>
<dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47236">
<title>A method of weighting adjustment for survey data subject to nonignorable nonresponse</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10900/47236</link>
<description>A method of weighting adjustment for survey data subject to nonignorable nonresponse
Zhang, Li-Chun
Weighting adjustment is a standard quasi-randomization approach
for survey data subject to nonresponse Little (1986). The existing
methods are typically based on the assumption that nonresponse is
independent of the survey variable conditional to the auxiliary
variables used to form the adjustment cells. In this paper we
consider nonignorable nonresponse which is independent of certain
auxiliary information conditional to the variable of interest. We
estimate the size of the sample adjustment cells using a method of
moment conditional to the sample. The method relies on only the
nonresponse mechanism, and is independent of the sample design. In
variance estimation, we evaluate the nonresponse effect on
estimation and design, analogously to the concept of design
effect. By comparing the nonresponse effects under a nonignorable
model against those under an ignorable one, we obtain a means of
measuring the effect of nonignorability. We motivate and
illustrate our approach for estimation of household composition.
</description>
<dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
